When the law of large numbers fails for increasing subsequences of random permutations
Abstract
Let the random variable Zn,k denote the number of increasing subsequences of length k in a random permutation from Sn, the symmetric group of permutations of \1,...,n\. In a recent paper [Random Structures Algorithms 29 (2006) 277--295] we showed that the weak law of large numbers holds for Zn,kn if kn=o(n2/5); that is, \[n∞Zn,knEZn,kn=1 in probability.\] The method of proof employed there used the second moment method and demonstrated that this method cannot work if the condition kn=o(n2/5) does not hold. It follows from results concerning the longest increasing subsequence of a random permutation that the law of large numbers cannot hold for Zn,kn if kn cn1/2, with c>2. Presumably there is a critical exponent l0 such that the law of large numbers holds if kn=O(nl), with l<l0, and does not hold if n∞knnl>0, for some l>l0. Several phase transitions concerning increasing subsequences occur at l=1/2, and these would suggest that l0=1/2. However, in this paper, we show that the law of large numbers fails for Zn,kn if n∞knn4/9=∞. Thus, the critical exponent, if it exists, must satisfy l0∈[2/5,4/9].
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.