Why we shouldn't fault Lucas and Penrose for continuing to believe in the Goedelian argument against computationalism
Bhupinder Singh Anand
Abstract
The only fault we can fairly lay at Lucas' and Penrose's doors, for continuing to believe in the essential soundness of the Goedelian argument, is their naive faith in, first, non-verifiable assertions in standard expositions of classical theory, and, second, in Goedel's unvalidated interpretation of his own formal reasoning. We show why their faith is misplaced in both instances.
Create a lesson
Related papers
A Note on the Measure of Vector and Pythagorean Theorem
Yu. V. Brezhnev
On Weighted Convex Graphs
Angshuman R. Goswami
On characterizations, Decompositions, and Stability of Convex Sequences
Angshuman R. Goswami
New Laplace convolution integrals involving exponential, error, and parabolic cylinder functions with applications in heat transfer and linear viscoelasticity
González Santander, Juan Luis
Resolution of Singularities in Positive Characteristic: Frobenius-Hasse Towers and Exceptional-History Descent
Chenxiao Tian
Information Geometry (IG) Lives at Edge or Boundary of SMG (statistically meaningful geometry): - the First Edge Theorem and Applications
Bing Cheng, Yi-Shuai Niu, Howell Tong et al.