Generalized Intersection Bodies are not Equivalent
Emanuel Milman
Abstract
In 2000, A. Koldobsky asked whether two types of generalizations of the notion of an intersection-body, are in fact equivalent. The structures of these two types of generalized intersection-bodies have been studied by the author in [http://www.arxiv.org/math.MG/0512058], providing substantial positive evidence for a positive answer to this question. The purpose of this note is to construct a counter-example, which provides a surprising negative answer to this question in a strong sense. This implies the existence of non-trivial non-negative functions in the range of the spherical Radon transform, and the existence of non-trivial spaces which embed in Lp for certain negative values of p.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Every compact operator is a commutator of compact operators
Zhichao Liu
Normal-Direction Energy and Fourier Restriction for Convex Planar Curves
Vicente Vergara
Zero-product problem for Toeplitz operators on the Fock space
Jie Qin
The best Musielak-Orlicz approximation by linear subspaces
Juan Costa Ponce, Sergio Favier, Fabián Levis
Lévy measures for Dirichlet-type spaces on the unit bidisc
Santu Bera, Shanola S. Sequeira
Quantum expanders and dimension-free commutator bounds
Tuan Tran