Discrepancy of Sums of two Arithmetic Progressions

Abstract

Estimating the discrepancy of the hypergraph of all arithmetic progressions in the set [N]=\1,2,,N\ was one of the famous open problems in combinatorial discrepancy theory for a long time. An extension of this classical hypergraph is the hypergraph of sums of k (k≥ 1 fixed) arithmetic progressions. The hyperedges of this hypergraph are of the form A1+A2++Ak in [N], where the Ai are arithmetic progressions. For this hypergraph Hebbinghaus (2004) proved a lower bound of (Nk/(2k+2)). Note that the probabilistic method gives an upper bound of order O((N N)1/2) for all fixed k. Pr\'ivetiv\'y improved the lower bound for all k≥ 3 to (N1/2) in 2005. Thus, the case k=2 (hypergraph of sums of two arithmetic progressions) remained the only case with a large gap between the known upper and lower bound. We bridge his gap (up to a logarithmic factor) by proving a lower bound of order (N1/2) for the discrepancy of the hypergraph of sums of two arithmetic progressions.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…