Two Remarks on Marcinkiewicz decompositions by Holomorphic Martingales

Abstract

The real part of H∞() is not dense in L∞(). The John-Nirenberg theorem in combination with the Helson-Szeg\"o theorem and the Hunt Muckenhaupt Wheeden theorem has been used to determine whether f∈ L∞() can be approximated by H∞() or not: (f, H∞)=0 if and only if for every >0 there exists 0>0 so that for >0 and any interval I . |\x∈ I:| f-( f)I|>\| |I|e-/ , where f denotes the Hilbert transform of f. See [G] p. 259. This result is contrasted by the following theor Let f∈ L∞ and >0. Then there is a function g∈ H∞() and a set E so that | E|< and f= g on E. theor This theorem is best regarded as a corollary to Men'shov's correction theorem. For the classical proof of Men'shov's theorem see [Ba, Ch VI 1-4]. Simple proofs of Men'shov's theorem -- together with significant extensions -- have been obtained by S.V. Khruschev in [Kh] and S.V. Kislyakov in [K1], [K2] and [K3]. In [S] C. Sundberg used -techniques (in particular [G, Theorem VIII.1. gave a proof of Theorem 1 that does not mention Men'shov's theorem. The purpose of this paper is to use a Marcinkiewicz decomposition on Holomorphic Martingales to give another proof of Theorem 1. In this way we avoid uniformly convergent Fourier series as well as -techniques.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…