The consistency of 2aleph0> alephomega + I(aleph2)=I(alephomega)
Abstract
An omega-coloring is a pair <f,B> where f:[B]2 ---> omega. The set B is the field of f and denoted Fld(f). Let f,g be omega-colorings. We say that f realizes the coloring g if there is a one-one function k:Fld(g) ---> Fld(f) such that for all x,y, u,v in dom(g) we have f(k(x),k(y)) not= f(k(u),k(v)) => g(x,y) not= g(u,v). We write f~g if f realizes g and g realizes f. We call the ~-classes of omega-colorings with finite fields identities. We say that an identity I is of size r if |Fld(f)|=r for some/all f in I. For a cardinal kappa and f:[kappa]2 ---> omega we define I(f) to be the collection of identities realized by f and I (kappa) to be bigcap I(f)| f:[kappa]2 ---> omega. We show that, if ZFC is consistent then ZFC + 2aleph0> alephomega + I(aleph2)=I(alephomega) is consistent.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.