Geometic vertex operators
Ilya Zakharevich
Abstract
Vertex operators, being families of birational transformations of infinite-dimensional algebraic ``varieties'' M, act on appropriate line bundles on M. However, they act on (meromorphic) sections only aspartial operators: they are defined on a subspace (in an appropriatelattice of subspaces of Mer(M)), and send "smooth families" of vectors in such a subspace to smooth families. Axiomatizing this, we defineconformal fields as arbitrary families of partial operators in Mer(M) which satisfy both these properties. The ``variety'' M related to standard vertex operators is formed by rational functions of one variable z in Z=P1, changing the variety Z one obtains different examples of M, and multidimensional analogues of vertex operators. One can cover Mer(M) by ``big smooth subsets''; these subsets are parameterized by appropriate projective bundles over Hilbert schemes of points on Z. We deduce conformal associativity relation for conformal fields, and conformal commutation relations for Laurent coefficients of commuting conformal fields from geometric properties of the Hilbert schemes. We start with providing examples of OPE in smooth families, i.e., smooth families a(s) and b(t) (of partial linear operators) such that a(s)b(t) has a pole when s=t. We also provide geometric description of boson-fermion correspondence, and relations of this correspondence to geometry of the set of meromorphic functions.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Morphism spaces on low degree hypersurfaces
Hrishabh Mishra
Connecting families of curves
Nathan Chen, Robert Lazarsfeld, Federico Moretti
The Last Picard Rank 1 Double-Mirror Calabi-Yau Pair?
Michał Kapustka, Marco Rampazzo, Prajwal Samal
Conductor-Discriminant Inequality for Tamely Ramified Cyclic Covers II
Connor Stewart
The Hurwitz existence problem in prime degree
Jijian Song, Hailin Wen, Zebao Zhang
Conductor-Discriminant Inequality for Tamely Ramified Cyclic Covers I
Andrew Obus, Padmavathi Srinivasan, Connor Stewart