On a Result of Atkin and Lehner
Abstract
We wish to give a new proof of one of the main results of Atkin and Lehner. Their theory depends, among other things, on a theorem characterizing forms in Sk(Gamma0(N)) whose Fourier coefficients satisfy a certain vanishing condition. Our proof involves rephrasing this vanishing condition in terms of representation theory; this, together with an elementary linear algebra argument, allows us to rewrite the problem as a collection of local problems. Furthermore, the classical phrasing of the theorem makes the resulting local problems trivial; this is in contrast to the method of Casselman, whose local problem relies upon knowledge of the structure of irreducible representations of GL2(Qp). Our proof is therefore much more accessible to mathematicians who aren't specialists in the representation theory of p-adic groups; the method is also applicable to other Atkin-Lehner-style problems.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.