Discrete versions of the Beckman-Quarles theorem

Abstract

TO APPEAR IN AEQUATIONES MATHEMATICAE - WITHOUT THEOREM 2. THEOREM 2 IS CORRECTLY PROVED IN PREVIOUS VERSIONS 1 AND 2. AUTHOR'S VERSION 3 (WITH A NEW FIGURE 6A) IS UNNECESSARY. Let F ⊂eq R denote the field of numbers which are constructible by means of ruler and compass. We prove that: (1) if x,y ∈ Rn (n>1) and |x-y| is an algebraic number then there exists a finite set S(x,y) ⊂eq Rn containing x and y such that each map from S(x,y) to Rn preserving all unit distances preserves the distance between x and y; if x,y ∈ Fn then we can choose S(x,y) ⊂eq Fn, (2) only algebraic distances |x-y| have the property from item (1), (3) if X1,X2,...,Xm ∈ Rn (n>1) lie on some affine hyperplane then there exists a finite set L(X1,X2,...,Xm) ⊂eq Rn containing X1,X2,...,Xm such that each map from L(X1,X2,...,Xm) to Rn preserving all unit distances preserves the property that X1,X2,...,Xm lie on some affine hyperplane, (4) if J,K,L,M ∈ Rn (n>1) and |JK|=|LM| (|JK|<|LM|) then there exists a finite set C(J,K,L,M) ⊂eq Rn containing J,K,L,M such that any map f:C(J,K,L,M) Rn that preserves unit distance satisfies |f(J)f(K)|=|f(L)f(M)| (|f(J)f(K)|<|f(L)f(M)|).

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…