Analyzing the Weyl-Heisenberg Frame Identity

Abstract

In 1990, Daubechies proved a fundamental identity for Weyl-Heisenberg systems which is now called the Weyl-Heisenberg Frame Identity. WH-Frame Identity: If g∈ W(L∞,L1), then for all continuous, compactly supported functions f we have: \[Σm,n|<f,EmbTnag>|2 = 1bΣk∫ Rf(t)f(t-k/b)Σn g(t-na)g(t-na-k/b) dt.\] It has been folklore that the identity will not hold universally. We make a detailed study of the WH-Frame Identity and show: (1) The identity does not require any assumptions on ab (such as the requirement that ab 1 to have a frame); (2) As stated above, the identity holds for all f∈ L2( R); (3) The identity holds for all bounded, compactly supported functions if and only if g∈ L2( R); (4) The identity holds for all compactly supported functions if and only if Σn|g(x-na)|2 B a.e.; Moreover, in (2)-(4) above, the series on the right converges unconditionally; (5) In general, there are WH-frames and functions f∈ L2( R) so that the series on the right does not converge (even symmetrically). We give necessary and sufficient conditions for it to converge symmetrically; (6) There are WH-frames for which the series on the right always converges symmetrically to give the WH-Frame Identity, but there are functions for which the series does not converge and we classify when the series converges for all functions f∈ ; (7) There are WH-frames for which the series always converges, but it does not converge unconditionally for some functions, and we classify when we have unconditional convergence for all functions f; and (8) We show that the series converges unconditionally for all f∈ L2( R) if g satisfies the CC-condition.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…