Comments on the letter of P.Sabatier "An erroneous statement"
A. G. Ramm
Abstract
In his letter Sabatier writes that my statement "The Newton-Sabatier (NS) method for inverting the fixed-energy phase shifts for a potential is fundamentally wrong" is erroneous. In [2] my statement is proved. It is explained in [2] that the foundations of the NS method are wrong, and, in particular, that the basic integral equation of this method, in general is not uniquely solvable for some r>0, contrary to the implicit assumption of the NS method. If this equation is not uniquely solvable for some r>0, then the NS method breaks down: it produces a potential which is not locally integrable. Consequently, my conclusion was: the NS theory as an inverse scattering theory is fundamentally wrong in the sense that its foundations are wrong. This conclusion is fully justified in [2]. Additional comments on the Sabatier's letter are given.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Phase transitions in non-Hermitian spherical integrals
Pierre Bousseyroux, Marc Potters
Factorization method for a clamped obstacle from near-field measurements via a far-field transformation
General Ozochiawaeze, Isaac Harris
Asymmetric phase transitions in random noncommutative geometries
Benedek Bukor, Masoud Khalkhali, Samuel Kováčik et al.
A Cumulative Framework for Solid Deformation
Lev Steinberg
Classification of pairs of second-order Hamiltonian operators and hydrodynamic type systems in six components
Giorgio Gubbiotti, Lambertus Van Geemen, Pierandrea Vergallo
Reconstructability of Inverse Problems under Symmetry: Separating Structural, Effective, and Physical Upper Bounds
Isshin Arai