Permutation Weights for Affine Lie Algebras

Abstract

We show that permutation weights, which are previously introduced for finite Lie algebras, can be appropriately defined also for affine Lie algebras. This allows us to classify all the weights of an affine Weyl orbit explicitly. Let be a dominant weight of an affine Lie algebra GN(r) for r=1,2,3. At each and every order M of weight depths, the set M() of permutation weights is formed out of a finite number of dominant weights of the finite Lie algebra GN. In case of AN(1) algebras, we give the rules to determine the elements of a M() completely. As being a positive test of our proposal, we consider the problem of calculating weight multiplicities for affine Lie algebras and hence our discussions are based on explicit computations of Weyl-Kac character formula. It is known that weight multiplicities are provided by string functions which are defined to be formal power series ΣM=0∞ C(M) qM where the order M specifies the depth of weights contributing to C(M). In the conventional calculational schemes which are based on Kac-Peterson form of affine Weyl groups, Weyl-Kac formula includes a sum over a part of the whole root lattice and hence it is seen that the roots of the same length contribute in general to C(M) for several values of M. On the contrary, we will determine, for any fixed value of M, the complete set of weights having depth M and contributing only to C(M). For applications of Weyl-Kac formula, one must also know the signatures which correspond to weights within the Weyl orbits of strictly dominant weights. This is given by the aid of a properly defined index. Another emphasis is that the way of discussion adopted here gives us a possibility for extensions to other infinite dimensional Lie algebras beyond affine Lie algebras.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…