Emergence is coupled to scope, not level
Alex J. Ryan
Abstract
Since its application to systems, emergence has been explained in terms of levels of observation. This approach has led to confusion, contradiction, incoherence and at times mysticism. When the idea of level is replaced by a framework of scope, resolution and state, this confusion is dissolved. We find that emergent properties are determined by the relationship between the scope of macrostate and microstate descriptions. This establishes a normative definition of emergent properties and emergence that makes sense of previous descriptive definitions of emergence. In particular, this framework sheds light on which classes of emergent properties are epistemic and which are ontological, and identifies fundamental limits to our ability to capture emergence in formal systems.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Low-Dimensional Reduction Theory for Populations of Phase Oscillators with a Gaussian Frequency Distribution
Kai Tokunaga
Asymmetric Coupling Anisotropy for Causal Information Filtering in Physical Reservoirs
Takashi Hikihara, Yuma Aoki
Mixed-mode bursting oscillations in a three-timescale biophysical neuronal oscillator model
Ngoc Anh Phan, Yangyang Wang
Topology-Biased Resource Constraints Shape Synchronization Pathways in Hindmarsh-Rose Oscillator Networks
Zhouqi Li, Xiaoyan He, Yuanhong Bi et al.
Inertial synchronization of networked oscillators in arbitrary dimensions
Kirill Kovalenko, Bruce X. Dai, Fanshu Fang et al.
Thermodynamic criticality of coupled oscillators
Suvam Pal, Sudipta Mukherji, Jurgen Kurths et al.