Do We Accurately Know the Formation of Solar 8B?

Abstract

A detailed examination of current data on S17 (as opposed to an examination of S17(0) only) excludes quoting S17(0) with sufficiently small uncertainty. In contrast to suggestions that S17(0) is now known with the accuracy of 3%, the exact value of S17(0) is dependent on the choice of the data and the choice of theory used for extrapolation. In addition recent high precision results (including the Seattle data) on S17 which are in good agreement, still differ on the measured slopes, as do theoretical models that predict different d-wave contribution, precluding an accurate extrapolation to zero energy of the consistent data. Using a common extrapolation of only the consistent high precision data, suggests a value of S17(0) = 21.2 0.5 eV-b, but a value equal to or smaller than 19.0 eV-b can not be excluded due to the uncertainty in the extrapolation, leading to an additional error of +0.0 -3.0 eV-b. This (unacceptable) situation must be cleared by future experiments.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…