Do We Accurately Know the Formation of Solar 8B?
Moshe Gai
Abstract
A detailed examination of current data on S17 (as opposed to an examination of S17(0) only) excludes quoting S17(0) with sufficiently small uncertainty. In contrast to suggestions that S17(0) is now known with the accuracy of 3%, the exact value of S17(0) is dependent on the choice of the data and the choice of theory used for extrapolation. In addition recent high precision results (including the Seattle data) on S17 which are in good agreement, still differ on the measured slopes, as do theoretical models that predict different d-wave contribution, precluding an accurate extrapolation to zero energy of the consistent data. Using a common extrapolation of only the consistent high precision data, suggests a value of S17(0) = 21.2 0.5 eV-b, but a value equal to or smaller than 19.0 eV-b can not be excluded due to the uncertainty in the extrapolation, leading to an additional error of +0.0 -3.0 eV-b. This (unacceptable) situation must be cleared by future experiments.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Differential measurement of global polarization of Λ, Ξ, and Ω hyperons in Au+Au collisions at sNN=7.7--27~GeV from the RHIC Beam Energy Scan-II
The STAR Collaboration
Regularity of core coupled high-spin structure in neutron-rich 196-202Au isotopes approaching N =126
Y. Cho, Y. H. Kim, A. Navin et al.
Global polarization of Λ, Ξ, and Ω hyperons in Au+Au collisions from the RHIC Beam Energy Scan-II
STAR Collaboration
Probing the charm-quark dead cone effect in heavy ion collisions
CMS Collaboration
Estimating cosmogenic backgrounds in nEXO at SNOLAB using Geant4 and FLUKA
R. Ross, S. Al Kharusi, T. Brunner et al.
Current Results on Light Hypernuclei in the WASA-FRS HypHI Experiment
C. Rappold, P. Achenbach, H. Alibrahim Alfaki et al.