Nuclear matter properties and relativistic mean-field theory
K. C. Chung, C. S. Wang, A. J. Santiago, J. W. Zhang
Abstract
Nuclear matter properties are calculated in the relativistic mean field theory by using a number of different parameter sets. The result shows that the volume energy a1 and the symmetry energy J are around the acceptable values 16MeV and 30MeV respectively; the incompressibility K0 is unacceptably high in the linear model, but assumes reasonable value if nonlinear terms are included; the density symmetry L is around 100MeV for most parameter sets, and the symmetry incompressibility Ks has positive sign which is opposite to expectations based on the nonrelativistic model. In almost all parameter sets there exists a critical point (ρc, δc), where the minimum and the maximum of the equation of state are coincident and the incompressibility equals zero, falling into ranges 0.014fm-3<ρc<0.039fm-3 and 0.74<δc0.95; for a few parameter sets there is no critical point and the pure neutron matter is predicted to be bound. The maximum mass MNS of neutron stars is predicted in the range 2.45M≤ MNS≤ 3.26M, the corresponding neutron star radius RNS is in the range 12.2km≤ RNS≤ 15.1km.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Parametrization of unitary matrices, parametrizing the symmetric S matrix and the NN S matrix above the inelastic threshold
N. A. Khokhlov
Thermofractal Dynamics in the Multisource Thermal Model: A Unified Approach to Multiparticle Production
Airton Deppman, Trambak Bhattacharyya, Maciej Rybczyński et al.
Electroweak Constraints on Nuclear Neutron Distributions and the Low-Energy Weak Mixing Angle
Xu-Run Huang, Tong-Gang Yue, Zhen Zhang et al.
Active-subspace learning reveals dominant parameter directions in nuclear observables
Tom Plies, Margarida Companys Franzke, Achim Schwenk
Shape coexisting intruder states in even Sn isotopes and their influence on the B4/2<1 anomaly
P. Buganu, R. Benjedi, R. Budaca
Light nucleus and hypernucleus production at RHIC and LHC energies: a comparative study of phenomenological models
J. Aichelin, A. Andronic, F. Bellini et al.