Comment on "Geometric absorption of electromagnetic angular momentum", C. Konz, G. Benford
Timo A. Nieminen
Abstract
The core theorem on which the above paper is centred - that a perfectly conducting body of revolution absorbs no angular momentum from an axisymmetric electromagnetic wave field - is in fact a special case of a more general result in electromagnetic scattering theory. In addition, the scaling of the efficiency of transfer of angular momentum to an object with the wavelength and object size merits further discussion. Finally, some comments are made on the choice of terminology and the erroneous statement that a circularly polarized plane wave does not carry angular momentum.
Create a lesson
Related papers
3D Printed Monolithic Optomechanical Chassis for an Unbalanced Field-Widened Interferometer
Ramy Tannous, Dogan Sinar, Sagar Patel et al.
Photonic and Electronic Interaction of TMD-Hybridized ZnO Nanowire Lasers
Moritz Willems, Edwin Eobaldt, Alexander Zaunick et al.
Geometric Pumping of Optical Work in Coherent Wave Scattering
Zeyu Kuang, Konstantin Y. Bliokh, Stefan Rotter
Phase matching and mode coupling in photonic-crystal ring resonators
Alexander E. Ulanov, Lukas Bengel, Tobias Herr
Directional Control of Chiral Polymer Emission Dissymmetry by Plasmonic Metasurfaces
Debapriya Pal, Louis Minion, David Reger et al.
Evanescent-Depth-Engineered High-Q topological Cavities for Strong Photon-Exciton Coupling
Zihan Mo, Renxuan Peng, Haoyang Zhang et al.