Do redshifted cosmological photons really violate the principle of energy conservation?
Alasdair Macleod
Abstract
Although the Universe is far from understood, we are fairly confident about some key features: Special Relativity (SR) describes the kinematics of inertial frames; General Relativity (GR) explains gravitation; the Universe had a beginning in time and has been expanding since. Nevertheless it is quite difficult to see the 'big picture', although the idea of applying GR to the entire Universe has been very successful with a model emerging that is consistent with observation. One unpleasant feature of the model is that cosmological photons appear not to conserve energy, and the only explanation forthcoming is the claim that GR is exempt from the principle of energy conservation. It is demonstrated here that cosmological observations may legitimately be projected onto flat spacetime and can then be treated Special Relativistically, whereupon energy conservation is restored. This is not to say that the concordance General Relativistic cosmological model is incorrect, just that in observational terms there is no energy conservation anomaly.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Deriving Schwarzschild and Kerr from the Einstein Equivalence Principle
G. Alencar
Binary Classifier Wire-Resistance Attack on KLJN: Bayes-Optimal Limit at a Narrow Resistor Gap
Mehmet Yildirim, Fahrettin Ay, Laszlo B. Kish
On the notion of kinetic energy in a spacetime of maximal proper acceleration
Ricardo Gallego Torromé
Is MOND an effect of cosmic frame-dragging à la Mach?
Manuel Uruena Palomo
Partially Thermalized eV-Scale Sterile Neutrinos in Dynamical Dark Energy and Non-Flat Cosmologies
Gopal Kashyap, Kanhaiya Lal Pandey
Metric Variation of the Energy-Momentum Tensor of a Perfect Fluid and Its Applications to Cosmology and Neutron Stars
Pham Van Ky