Can we believe in high climate sensitivity?
J. D. Annan, J. C. Hargreaves
Abstract
The climate response to anthropogenic forcing has long been one of the dominant uncertainties in predicting future climate change (Houghton et al, 2001). Many observationally-based estimates of climate sensitivity (S) have been presented in recent years, with most of them assigning significant probability to extremely high sensitivity, such as P(S>6C)>5%. However, closer examination reveals that these estimates are based on a number of implausible implicit assumptions. We explain why these estimates cannot be considered credible and therefore have no place in the decision-making process. In fact, when basic probability theory is applied and reasonable assumptions are made, much greater confidence in a moderate value for S (~2.5C) is easily justified, with S very unlikely to be as high as 4.5C.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Bridging short- and medium-range weather forecasting with machine learning
Timothy A. Smith, Mariah Pope, Sergey Frolov et al.
Detectability of Forced ENSO Changes under Global Warming: Insights from the Recharge Oscillator
Sooman Han, Jérôme Vialard, Alexey V. Fedorov et al.
When Does Forecast-Error Energy Grow Logistically in Geophysical Turbulence?
Malaquias Peña
A place for stabilization alongside tipping cascades: the AMOC-cryosphere system
Sacha Sinet
Missing the Butterfly and Predicting the Past: Features or Bugs of Accurate AI Weather Models?
Pedram Hassanzadeh, Weidong Li, Y. Qiang Sun et al.
AICON: An operational global machine learning weather forecasting model
Tobias Goecke, Marek Jacob, Florian Prill et al.