Comments on `Stable Quantum Computation of Unstable Classical Chaos,' `Efficient Quantum Computing Insensitive to Phase Errors,' and `Quantum Computer Inverting Time Arrow for Macroscopic Systems'
Alec Maassen van den Brink
Abstract
Recently, the paper B. Georgeot and D.L. Shepelyansky, Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 5393 (2001) has been criticized [C. Zalka, quant-ph/0110019; L. Di'osi, quant-ph/0110026]. The Letter claims an exponential speedup and reduction in error sensitivity, when phase-space density evolution under the Arnold cat map is performed on a quantum computer. On the one hand, some points have not yet been made by previous respondents. On the other, the authors' reaction [quant-ph/0110142] raises new issues. The present note addresses both.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Parallel quantum channel discrimination and numerical ranges in tensor product subspaces
Adam Bílek, Paulina Lewandowska, Ryszard Kukulski
Asymptotically Good Quantum Locally Testable Codes
William Gay, Fernando Granha Jeronimo
All causally separable quantum processes are quantum circuits with classical control of causal order
Julian Wechs, Alastair A. Abbott, Cyril Branciard
Analytic leakage suppression with a single control field: fast two-qubit gates with tunable couplers
Lukas Heunisch, Michael J. Hartmann, Aashish A. Clerk
Procrastinating einselection in non-Markovian quantum dynamics
Michael J. Moody, Tara Kalsi, Agung Budiyono et al.
Quantum Entropy Contraction and Factorization from Hypercontractivity
Li Gao, Lijun Wang