Logical Inconsistencies in Proofs of the Theorem of Bell
Karl Hess, Walter Philipp
Abstract
We discuss a class of proofs of Bell-type inequalities that are based on tables of potential outcomes. These proofs state in essence: if one can only imagine (or write down in a table) the potential outcome of a hidden parameter model for EPR experiments then a contradiction to experiment and quantum mechanics follows. We show that these proofs do not contain hidden variables that relate to time or, if they do, lead to logical contradictions that render them invalid.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Gaussian entanglement and quantum communication: geodesic optimization and multimode bounds
Hemant K. Mishra, Mark M. Wilde
On the coincidence of discrete and continuous definitions of Entanglement of Formation
Haobo Ma, Maksim E. Shirokov, Wenlin Zhang
EFI1PRS
Rishabh Batra
Relative-Entropy Geometry and Convergence in Nonconvex Wiretap Optimization
Farzin Salek, Masahito Hayashi
Deterministic and programmable generation of mechanical multipartite entangled states
Isabelle Franzen, Max-Emanuel Kern, Q. Rumman Rahman et al.
Quantum-enhanced mechanical sensing with machine-learning estimation
Finn Müßigbrodt, Andraž Omahen, Q. Rumman Rahman et al.