Objective vs Observer Measurements
Richard A Mould
Abstract
Post-inflationary boundary conditions are essential to the existence of our highly structured universe, and these can only come about through quantum mechanical state reductions - i.e., through measurements. The choice is between: An 'objective' measurement that allows reduction to occur independent of conscious observers, and an 'observer' based measurement that ties reduction to the existence of a conscious observer. It is shown in this paper that that choice cannot be determined empirically; so how we finally understand state reduction will be decided by the way that reduction is used in a wider (future) theoretical framework. Key Words: consciousness, decoherence, stochastic choice, wave collapse.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Comment on "Supervised Learning with Quantum Hamiltonian Embeddings" (arXiv:2610.26833)
Alexander G. Abanov, Luca Candelori, Kharen Musaelian
Data informed Ansatz Selection for Variational Quantum Circuits
Manav Seksaria, Advith Desu, Anil Prabhakar
Operational Thresholds for Long-Range Entanglement in Quantum Networks
Arn Caesar, Xinqi Hu, Kim Christensen
QECert: Formal Foundations for Quantum Error-Correction Theory in Lean
Keming He, Jiahan Chen, Enji Xiong et al.
Reopening the one clean qubit case of a semi-grand challenge
Christopher W. Mansell
Recoverability of Gravitational Entanglement under Decoherence
Yi-Xuan Wang, Julen S. Pedernales, Martin B. Plenio