Source separation as an exercise in logical induction
Kevin H. Knuth
Abstract
We examine the relationship between the Bayesian and information-theoretic formulations of source separation algorithms. This work makes use of the relationship between the work of Claude E. Shannon and the "Recent Contributions" by Warren Weaver (Shannon & Weaver 1949) as clarified by Richard T. Cox (1979) and expounded upon by Robert L. Fry (1996) as a duality between a logic of assertions and a logic of questions. Working with the logic of assertions requires the use of probability as a measure of degree of implication. This leads to a Bayesian formulation of the problem. Whereas, working with the logic of questions requires the use of entropy as a measure of the bearing of a question on an issue leading to an information-theoretic formulation of the problem.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Reduced latent leakage does not reliably predict lower likelihood bias in collider inference
Tong Pan
The Greedy Bump Bias: Local Profiling Geometry and the Look-Elsewhere Effect
Tommaso Dorigo
Multi-fidelity Monte Carlo estimation of floor response spectra under combined seismic and structural parameter uncertainties
Nils Baillie, Baptiste Kerleguer, Cyril Feau et al.
Parameter inference from a non-stationary unknown process using statistical feature-based slow feature analysis
Kieran S. Owens, Masako Tamaki, Ben D. Fulcher
A Probability Model for Pentagonal Prism Dice Rolls
Paul R. Hurst, J. Naleo Hyde
Geometry-native machine learning reconstruction of DSMC moment fields with support monitoring
Ehsan Roohi