Component-Level Inverse Design of Transmon Qubits Using Neural Networks
Olivia Seidel, Firas Abouzahr, Abhishek Chakraborty, Sadman Ahmed Shanto, Saikat Das, Daniel Baxter, Jonathan Asaadi, Nicola Pancotti, Haoyu Yang, Brucek Khailany, Sara Sussman, Enectali Figueroa-Feliciano, Eli M Levenson-Falk, Taylor L. Patti
Abstract
Designing a superconducting qubit to realize specific Hamiltonian parameters typically requires iterating through a time and compute-intensive forward loop in which the designer chooses a layout geometry, simulates it, extracts circuit parameters such as capacitances, and refines the geometry. We study the inverse version of this task using a neural-network workflow that maps target Hamiltonian parameters directly to component-level layout parameters, which we subsequently demonstrate on a planar transmon layout. During training, we pair the inverse model with a frozen forward surrogate model and evaluate the loss in Hamiltonian space rather than in layout-parameter space. In validation against a conventional EM solver, 97% of generated designs produce usable geometries, and the inverse-plus-surrogate pipeline reaches mean percent errors of 0.73% for qubit frequency and 1.58% for anharmonicity, comparable to or below the fabrication and simulation-to-measurement uncertainty expected for academic-process transmon devices of this type. A single pipeline query takes ~60 ms on CPU, versus ~2 min for a conventional EM capacitance extraction on the same hardware, a speedup of approximately 2,000x. Batching minimizes the AI model inference overhead, reducing the runtime to 3.1 microseconds per sample on CPU and 2.6 microseconds per sample on GPU at a batch size of 2048, resulting in speedups of 3.9 x 107 and 4.6 x 107, respectively, relative to a single conventional CPU EM extraction. Our results indicate that component-level inverse design usefully extends and complements conventional EM simulation, including for small datasets on the order of 1,000 samples.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Trading Circuit Depth for Pulse Sparsity in Chromatic Dynamical Decoupling
Amy F. Brown, Daniel A. Lidar
Optimal spectrum estimation
Ainesh Bakshi, Apoorv Vikram Singh, Xinyu Tan
Non-Abelian sheaf quantum LDPC codes: good and magical
Zimu Li, Fuchuan Wei, Zhengyi Han et al.
Learning and interpreting policies for simultaneous entanglement requests in quantum networks
Leon Rode, Sumeet Khatri, Supartha Podder
Sharp universal death of entanglement threshold for Pauli Hamiltonians
Bobak T. Kiani
Proper Agnostic Learning of Matrix Product States and Tree Tensor Networks
Constantin Cedillo Vayson de Pradenne, Jordan Cotler