Two-state generator extraction: property currents and a two-layer arrow of time in pre- and post-selected quantum dynamics
Seiki Saito
Abstract
Conditioning on both past and future assigns intermediate-time properties a causal observer does not; these time-symmetric assignments obey exact symmetry theorems and are measurable from trajectories. We use two-state generator extended dynamic mode decomposition (gEDMD): because weak values obey dAw/dt=i[H,A]w exactly, generator extraction, with an exact-derivative baseline, applies unchanged to them. First, a reflection involution on the pre-/post-selected ensemble splits every window-fitted friction uniquely as γfwd=γA+γS: γA, antisymmetric about the midpoint, carries the modes' boundary-condition physics; γS, symmetric, comes from the differencing scheme; both follow from the same data as (γfwdγbwd)/2. At a fixed inference resolution the arrow of time has two layers: the coherent-mode arrow reverses at the midpoint, the fluctuation-level one does not, γS dominating γA at every size and class. The difference is one of degree: γS is 34 times larger there than at the mode layer, and with the exact derivative both layers reverse: immunity belongs to the inference, not the ensemble. Second, in a lattice interferometer conditioned only at its ports, the quantum Cheshire-cat structure emerges unimposed: particle and polarization obey separate continuity equations, and a local field in the polarization-carrying arm rotates that phase alone, at exactly twice the field strength, entering the generator as a rigid imaginary shift, while the particle's weak density stays invariant to machine precision. We verify the sample-level identity and the two layers from 28 to 220 dimensions: |γA|/γS=0.09 to 0.27 across five classes; self-averaging makes it insensitive to class among those sharing a boundary modulation, removing the 2-N/2 overlap obstruction for N qubits.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Trading Circuit Depth for Pulse Sparsity in Chromatic Dynamical Decoupling
Amy F. Brown, Daniel A. Lidar
Optimal spectrum estimation
Ainesh Bakshi, Apoorv Vikram Singh, Xinyu Tan
Non-Abelian sheaf quantum LDPC codes: good and magical
Zimu Li, Fuchuan Wei, Zhengyi Han et al.
Learning and interpreting policies for simultaneous entanglement requests in quantum networks
Leon Rode, Sumeet Khatri, Supartha Podder
Sharp universal death of entanglement threshold for Pauli Hamiltonians
Bobak T. Kiani
Proper Agnostic Learning of Matrix Product States and Tree Tensor Networks
Constantin Cedillo Vayson de Pradenne, Jordan Cotler