Quantum vs Classical Erasure: Equal Bounds but Unequal Costs
Jan Neuser, Jake Xuereb, Pharnam Bakhshinezhad, Marcus Huber
Abstract
Irreversibility has a fundamental thermodynamic cost, erasing information inevitably generates heat. This connection is quantified by the Landauer bound, which gives the minimum dissipation needed to erase a single bit of information. While this bound applies in both classical and quantum settings, it is saturated only in idealised limits of infinite resources. Here, we provide a unified first principles description of finite-resource erasure in both classical and quantum systems. We begin by proving the communal folklore that in the idealised regime the erasure cost of a bit encoded in a quantum or classical system is the same. Despite this, we show that their practical implementation differs substantially: achieving comparable erasure quality in quantum systems requires more control, larger accessible energy gaps and longer operation times. Classical protocols can achieve the erasure of a comparable quantum protocol under far weaker constraints which we expose in trade-off relations. Our results explain why practical erasure schemes fall short of Landauer's bound and show that classical systems enjoy several fundamental thermodynamic advantages.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Trading Circuit Depth for Pulse Sparsity in Chromatic Dynamical Decoupling
Amy F. Brown, Daniel A. Lidar
Optimal spectrum estimation
Ainesh Bakshi, Apoorv Vikram Singh, Xinyu Tan
Non-Abelian sheaf quantum LDPC codes: good and magical
Zimu Li, Fuchuan Wei, Zhengyi Han et al.
Learning and interpreting policies for simultaneous entanglement requests in quantum networks
Leon Rode, Sumeet Khatri, Supartha Podder
Sharp universal death of entanglement threshold for Pauli Hamiltonians
Bobak T. Kiani
Proper Agnostic Learning of Matrix Product States and Tree Tensor Networks
Constantin Cedillo Vayson de Pradenne, Jordan Cotler