ReVoicer: Conversational Voice Annotation for Human-Centered, LLM-Assisted Peer Review
Matt Gottsacker, Ahinya Alwin, Hiroshi Furuya, Robert W. Lindeman, Gerd Bruder, Gregory F. Welch
Abstract
We present ReVoicer, a prototype system that supports peer reviewers by letting them converse with a paper as they read it. The reviewer highlights a passage and speaks (or types) a train-of-thought comment. A large language model then cleans the comment using the surrounding prose as context, tags it by comment type, and anchors it to the passage. After the reviewer finishes reading, ReVoicer checks the accumulated notes against a venue-specific rubric and reports coverage gaps to assist with further reflection. Then ReVoicer drafts a review composed from the reviewer's comments, written to a style guide distilled from the reviewer's past reviews. We describe the system's design rationale and implementation, and we outline plans for future evaluations.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Calmables: Demonstrating Closed-Loop Infrared Earables for Thermal Biofeedback and Relaxation Support
Valeria Zitz, Michael Küttner, Jonas Hummel et al.
"Okay, I've Actually Softened My Take on This": How People in Decentralized Social Media Reason about the Appropriateness of Generative AI
Romina Mahinpei, Manoel Horta Ribeiro, Andrés Monroy-Hernández et al.
Integrating Flipped Learning and Generative AI for Practice-Based Design Education: Evidence from a Knit Yarn Design Course
Hong Qu, Zichao Ling, Yadie Yang
EasyFashion: A Human-AI Co-Creation System for Personalized Fashion Design and Sewing Pattern Generation
Hong Qu, Zhaoxiang Xu, Jinbo Luo et al.
Verify, Offload, Extend & Recommend: Selective Complementarity in AI Support for Physical Activity Planning with Longitudinal Patient Data
Pavithren V S Pakianathan, Rania Islambouli, Diogo Branco et al.
Building a Cultural Perspective on Doctor-Patient Conversations
Krithi Shailya, Siddharth D Jaiswal, Ashish Makani et al.