A Protocol for Evaluating the Accessibility of AI-Generated Educational Materials: Prompt Configuration, WCAG-Derived Criteria, and Content Overload
Hector R. Amado-Salvatierra
Abstract
Generative AI tools increasingly produce educational materials: documents, slides, images, audio, and video, yet little is known about whether this content meets accessibility requirements. This paper presents a protocol for evaluating the accessibility of AI-generated educational materials against the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), across five content types and multiple tools. The protocol compares three conditions applied to the same tool: a generic instruction with no accessibility language; a single prompt explicitly configured with WCAG criteria; and a persistent, reusable accessibility profile loaded once rather than re-specified each time. Evaluation combines a WCAG rubric per content type with heuristic validation by accessibility experts, addressing a known limitation of automated scanners. Prior evidence shows generative AI tools reproduce inaccessible practices by default, and that explicit configuration measurably improves compliance. This paper extends that discussion to a dimension WCAG checklists miss: visual and informational overload common in AI-synthesized content. The main contribution is methodological: a reproducible protocol and open evaluation instrument, with cases documenting the barriers non-configured AI content creates for people with disabilities. A first exploratory application is also reported: a rubric-based compliance score rose from a pooled mean of 24.2% under the generic condition to 96.7% under the WCAG-configured condition, using one model, one artifact per condition and type, and single-evaluator scoring; the persistent-profile condition was not exercised. The protocol is a reusable resource for the community to apply and extend at full benchmark scale. Beyond the protocol, this work aims to raise awareness of accessibility obstacles generative AI can introduce, and encourage creators to consider accessibility when using these tools.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Prepared Or Unprepared? Evaluating Healthcare Workforce Readiness for Clinical Adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Nigeria
Abbas M. Rabiu, Abdulrazaq A. Zubair, Um-mulkhairi Ibrahim et al.
Could Underwater Data Centers Pose a Risk to AI Treaty Verification?
James Teague, Ashmita Rajmohan, Yannick Muehlhaeuser
Control-Theoretic Content Moderation
Benedetta Tessa, Serena Tardelli, Marco Avvenuti et al.
"If I Had to Buy Just ONE: Galaxy S26 Ultra": Auditing AI-Generated Product Recommendations
Lucas G. Uberti-Bona Marin, Thales Bertaglia, Giovanni Astante et al.
Understanding AI Provider Recommendations in Local Service Markets
Hazem Ibrahim, Yasir Zaki
Toward a Time-Aware Assessment Framework for the Carbon Cost of AI-Enabled Decarbonization
Chenrui Xu, Burcu Akinci, Christopher McComb