Constrained Co-Design for Photonic Bayesian Neural Networks
Hendrik Borras, Xiao Wang, Bernhard Klein, Robin Janssen, Frank Brückerhoff-Plückelmann, Wolfram Pernice, Holger Fröning
Abstract
Classical neural networks frequently produce overconfident predictions on ambiguous or out-of-distribution (OOD) data, a liability that grows with each AI system deployed in safety-critical real-world scenarios. Bayesian neural networks (BNNs) provide a principled framework for uncertainty-aware prediction by replacing deterministic parameters with probability distributions, but repeated sampling increases latency, memory traffic, and energy consumption. Photonic probabilistic computing offers a promising alternative by exploiting intrinsic optical stochasticity for fast and parallel sampling. However, photonic BNNs are not ideal samplers: analog constraints on quantization, programming error, dynamic range, and representable mean and variance restrict the variational families that can be implemented in hardware. In this work, we study which hardware-imposed constraints limit scalable photonic BNN inference, how these constraints can be represented, and which ranges can be tolerated by photonic BNNs beyond small proof-of-concept networks. We formulate photonic BNN inference as constrained stochastic variational inference and perform a systematic ablation study over stochasticity location, stochasticity modality, quantization, programming error, and mean/variance bounds. From these results, we derive concrete co-design guidelines that distinguish hardware constraints that can be compensated by training from those requiring hardware or architecture intervention. We validate these guidelines under coupled, hardware-realistic constraints on Dirty-MNIST, CIFAR-10, and CINIC-10, using Fashion-MNIST and SVHN as OOD benchmarks, showing that hardware-aware training recovers predictive performance and uncertainty quality whenever the required variational family remains representable, whereas violations of representational limits require targeted hardware modifications.
Create a lesson
Related papers
How Model Growth, Recursion, and Boundary Operators Influence Scaling Exponents
Zixi Chen, Akshay Vegesna, Samip Dahal et al.
Evidence-Grounded Agentic Formulation Development in an Autonomous Laboratory
Michael M. Craig, Riley J. Hickman, Yingshan Ma et al.
Probabilistic Linear Explanations
Frederic Koriche, Jean-Marie Lagniez, Chi Tran
Double descent is the principle of least action
Congzhou M Sha
RLLBC-Lib: An Educational Code Library for Reinforcement Learning and Learning-Based Control
Bernd Frauenknecht, Emma Cramer, Artur Eisele et al.
Higher-order pruning of experts in mixture-of-experts language models
Alex M. Tseng, Prannay Kaul, Luca Zancato et al.