Bottleneck Paths Reduce to Deterministic Graphical Games and a Counterexample to a Claimed Linear-Time Algorithm
Egor Gorbachev
Abstract
Chechik, Kaplan, Thorup, Zamir, and Zwick (STACS 2016) claimed a simple deterministic linear-time comparison-based algorithm for solving deterministic two-player, turn-based, zero-sum terminal-payoff games, also known as deterministic graphical games (DGGs). We give a counterexample to their algorithm. We also give a deterministic linear-time reduction from the directed s-t bottleneck path (BP) problem to the DGG problem. Consequently, a linear-time comparison-based algorithm for computing the value of a designated start vertex in a DGG would yield a linear-time comparison-based algorithm for directed s-t BP. Whether directed s-t BP admits such an algorithm has remained open since Gabow and Tarjan gave their O(m* n)-time algorithm. Thus, a positive resolution of the open question for DGGs would also resolve the corresponding open question for directed s-t BP.
Create a lesson
Related papers
A Near-Optimal Space Lower Bound for Euclidean Diameter Estimation in Dynamic Streams
Ashwin Padaki, Krish Singal, Erik Waingarten
A Walk From Free Probability to Matrix Discrepancy I: Matrix Spencer
Tarun Kathuria
A Walk From Free Probability to Matrix Discrepancy II: Weaver's Problem and the Kadison-Singer Conjecture
Tarun Kathuria
Degree-Free Spectral Independence for Log-Concave Holant Measures
Xiaoyu Chen, Zejia Chen, Xinyuan Zhang
Optimizing Both Checking and Update Costs in Random Walk Search
Simon Apers, Marin Costes
Routing Multiple Agents Below the Sum of Distances
Matthias Bentert, Eduard Eiben, Fedor V. Fomin et al.