Exploiting Structure in the Boolean Weighted Constraint Satisfaction Problem: A Constraint Composite Graph-Based Approach
Hong Xu
Abstract
What is "structure," and how can we exploit it in combinatorial optimization? Reasoning tasks such as system design, state estimation, and prediction can be cast as combinatorial optimization problems (COPs), traditionally attacked by dedicated algorithms that fail outside their narrow subclass, while communities working on equivalent problems reinvent each other's techniques. The weighted constraint satisfaction problem (WCSP) is a general framework that subsumes COPs from many communities and represents complex physical and non-physical systems, from spin glasses to social networks. Is such generality a curse? Our answer is to exploit "structure": a general-purpose WCSP algorithm should automatically imitate the specialized algorithm for whatever subclass its input belongs to. A WCSP has macro (graphical) structure, which variables interact, and micro (numerical) structure, how they interact. Separate schools of thought exploit one or the other, never both. The constraint composite graph (CCG), introduced in 2008, unifies them: it is an undirected graph over a WCSP instance's variables plus auxiliary ones, on which minimum weighted vertex cover (MWVC) solves the original instance. It is efficiently constructible, but largely unexploited. This dissertation answers three questions affirmatively. The CCG has theoretical advantages beyond identifying tractable classes (new properties proved here); it is practically useful (efficient implementation and experiments); and it extends promisingly to non-Boolean variables (new encodings). We use the CCG to (a) kernelize a WCSP instance, fixing optimal values of some variables by maxflow before search begins, (b) improve min-sum message passing, (c) exploit integer linear programming solvers, and (d) solve COPs on quantum annealers. Solving general COPs faster classically also yields better baselines for the debated quantum advantage.
Create a lesson
Related papers
MightyPPL : Towards model checking MTL
Hsi-Ming Ho, Shankara Narayanan Krishna, Khushraj Madnani et al.
Counting on Nowhere Dense Classes
Steffen van Bergerem, Nicole Schweikardt
Towards a Proof-Theoretic Analysis of Incorrect/Incomplete Proofs
Matthias Baaz, Mariami Gamsakhurdia
Descriptive Complexity in Lean: Completeness by First-Order Reductions
Pierre Senellart, Anton Gnatenko
Predictable Modelling and Analysis of Software-defined Vehicle Implementations
Pavlo Tokariev, Yosri Ayari, Julien Deantoni
Refining Timing Uncertainty from Logical Time Specification to Operation
Pavlo Tokariev, Julien Deantoni