Duality and Error for Predictively Oriented Inference

Abstract

Predictively oriented (PrO) inference quantifies uncertainty by selecting a distribution over model parameters to optimize a scoring rule applied to the induced predictive distribution, together with a divergence penalty from a reference distribution. By applying the scoring rule after averaging model densities, PrO inference targets predictive performance, accounting for model misspecification. We focus on the logarithmic score with general $ϕ$-divergence regularization. Our contributions are twofold. First, we derive a finite-dimensional dual formulation of PrO inference. For $n$ observations, the dual problem has $n+1$ variables. We establish zero-duality-gap criteria and optimality conditions that relate the primal and dual solutions. When primal and dual solutions exist, these conditions yield a semi-analytical representation of the PrO posterior and certificates for assessing the accuracy of numerical solutions. For Kullback--Leibler regularization, the posterior has an exponential form. Second, we derive a finite-sample excess predictive-risk bound for approximate PrO posteriors that separates sampling fluctuation, approximation under a divergence budget, regularization, and numerical optimization error. The result applies even when the benchmark predictive risk is not attained by any probability distribution over the model parameters having finite divergence from the reference distribution. We use an exactly solvable categorical example to show that predictive-risk convergence can imply convergence to a unique predictive distribution even though the parameter distributions have no weak limit on the original parameter space. The example also shows that different $ϕ$-divergences can require different regularization schedules. We conclude with a misspecified Gaussian location-mixture example that illustrates the dual computation, primal recovery, and numerical accuracy checks.