When Can You Trust Offline Evaluation of Equal-Cost Top-k Allocation? A Controlled, Reproducible Benchmark and Practitioner's Guide
Binshuang Li
Abstract
Organizations decide whom to treat under a budget and want to know what a targeting rule would have earned before deploying it. Off-policy evaluation promises this from logged data, but the deployable rule is a deterministic top-k policy: it removes all averaging over actions, so weak overlap hits the estimate directly. We benchmark six estimators across five datasets and two known-effect sweeps, and validate the mechanisms against a non-simulated paired reference. First, weak overlap is governed by logger-target action alignment, not by logging sharpness alone: what governs support is the logger's probability of the target's actions. Sharpening a logger built from the target's own score barely moves overlap over the tested range; action-level disagreement collapses it. Effective sample size ranks this risk across logging environments, but is weak at ranking candidates within the single log a practitioner holds, and its cut point does not transfer. Second, the optimizer's curse is not fixed by cross-fitting the outcome nuisance. When the rule is fit on the data used to evaluate it, cross-fitting the nuisance alone leaves the reuse bias in place and makes it worse. Honest policy-level splitting avoids the reuse by targeting the learning procedure's value -- a change of estimand, not a de-biasing of the full-sample policy. Third, propensity-estimation error is the largest degradation we measure: an out-of-fold estimate hurts IPS more than any other stress we apply, leaves doubly-robust estimation almost unchanged, and can invert the overlap diagnostic itself. Logging is synthesized and propensities floored at 0.02, so every failure occurs with bounded weights; the floor also reduces the two tuned hybrids to their untuned parents, leaving four practically distinct estimators, and all exact-value surfaces are synthetic or semi-synthetic. We release the benchmark; public data only.
Create a lesson
Related papers
How Model Growth, Recursion, and Boundary Operators Influence Scaling Exponents
Zixi Chen, Akshay Vegesna, Samip Dahal et al.
Evidence-Grounded Agentic Formulation Development in an Autonomous Laboratory
Michael M. Craig, Riley J. Hickman, Yingshan Ma et al.
Probabilistic Linear Explanations
Frederic Koriche, Jean-Marie Lagniez, Chi Tran
Double descent is the principle of least action
Congzhou M Sha
RLLBC-Lib: An Educational Code Library for Reinforcement Learning and Learning-Based Control
Bernd Frauenknecht, Emma Cramer, Artur Eisele et al.
Higher-order pruning of experts in mixture-of-experts language models
Alex M. Tseng, Prannay Kaul, Luca Zancato et al.