Flux control of measurement back-action and Leggett-Garg correlations in chiral quantum walks
Paolo Luppi
Abstract
Gauge-invariant fluxes control interference in chiral continuous-time quantum walks. We investigate how they affect sequential measurements at a single vertex, using a dichotomic observable that distinguishes return to that vertex from occupation of its complement. For a walker initially localized at the measured vertex, the complete two-time statistics, including measurement back-action and Leggett--Garg correlators, are determined exactly by the return amplitude, connecting temporal correlations to the local spectral measure and gauge-invariant closed-walk interference. At short times, the leading disturbance is independent of the Peierls phases, whereas flux sensitivity enters at higher orders through interference among closed walks. We further identify a graph-independent sufficient mechanism for saturating the Lüders bound: flux can reduce the rooted dynamics to a balanced two-dimensional Krylov subspace with equal spectral weights, yielding a constructive flux-engineering criterion for attaining the Lüders bound of 3/2 at finite times. The mechanism is realized exactly on a two-flux diamond graph, where destructive interference renders additional rooted modes dark and the local back-action depends on relative combinations of the two independent fluxes. For flux-threaded cycles, an exact winding-number expansion reveals a parity-dependent onset: the leading flux contrast occurs generically at order tN for even cycles and t2N for odd cycles. Across the cycles examined, flux can either enhance the maximal Leggett--Garg violation or shift strong violations to earlier measurement times, with half flux driving the four-site cycle to the Lüders bound. These results establish gauge-invariant flux as a resource for engineering local measurement back-action and temporal quantum correlations.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Continuous variable distributed quantum sensing in integrated photonics
Bethany Puzio, Oliver M. Green, Joel F. Tasker et al.
Securing quantum error correction against misleading advice from AI agents
A. Barış Özgüler
Exact logical error rates for magic state cultivation
Kwok Ho Wan, Ainhoa Zapirain
Hamiltonian engineering via pulses: beyond group averaging
Ivan Beschastnyi, Lucah Patel, David Tinoco
Logarithmic-depth quantum simulation of boson sampling
Changhun Oh
Entanglement swapping across a five-node relay in a multiplexed quantum-classical network
Andrew R. Cameron, Jordan M. Thomas, Alexandru Macridin et al.