Reconstructing Historical Manuscripts through MSI: The Potential of Contrast in Assessing Image Quality and Legibility
Anna Breger
Abstract
Digital restoration of historical manuscript images aims to improve readability while preserving the authenticity of cultural heritage documents. However, evaluating quality of restored manuscripts remains challenging, where readability is often subjective and expert annotations are scarce. This study investigates the suitability of contrast-based image quality measures to assess quality and legibility of reconstructed manuscript images from multi-spectral imaging. Two experiments were conducted with publicly-available data sets, facilitating manual quality scores by experts and full-reference image quality measures as reference evaluations. The results show that potential contrast achieves the highest correlation with expert ratings, while contrast-to-noise ratio demonstrates the strongest agreement with full-reference quality measures. Overall, contrast-based measures consistently outperform general image quality measures, demonstrating their potential as objective indicators of manuscript legibility and reconstruction quality.
Create a lesson
Related papers
PhysVGGT: Feed-Forward Dense Physical Property Estimation from A Single Image
Sneha Paul, Guile Wu, Bingbing Liu et al.
NormLift: From Lifted Features To Semantic Reliability In 3D Gaussian Splatting
Yihan Zang, Da Li, Dominik Engel et al.
Decodable but Misrouted: Sparse Features Uncover a Readout Gap in Vision-Language Models for Harmful Meme Detection
Girish A. Koushik, Diptesh Kanojia, Helen Treharne
Copy What Is Seen, Generate What Is Not: Training-Free Anomaly-Aware Video Restoration
Zhida Qu, Shengchao Chen
Using OCR Heads to Verbalize Image Semantics
Sheridan Feucht, Benno Krojer, Sarah Wang et al.
DISTA-Net++: Rethinking Infrared Small Target Unmixing Beyond Sub-Pixel Separation
Mengze Xu, Zhu Liu, Weidong Sheng et al.