Measuring student understanding in quantum computing: Development and validation of the Quantum Computing Conceptual Survey
Josephine C. Meyer, Molly Griston, Gina Passante, Steven J. Pollock, Bethany R. Wilcox
Abstract
Research-based assessments (RBAs) have proven to be valuable tools in PER, supporting both instructional reform and foundational research. In the rapidly-growing field of Quantum Information Science (QIS), the lack of suitable RBAs limits the field's ability to make evidence-based decisions about curricula and program development. In this paper, we introduce the Quantum Computing Conceptual Survey (QCCS), an instrument developed to help address this gap by measuring student conceptual understanding in the foundations of quantum computing. Using pilot data from over 50 courses and 700 students, we present evidence supporting the validity of the QCCS for use in introductory QIS courses, drawing on analyses from both classical test theory and the Rasch model. We detail the potential uses for the QCCS, intending for it to serve as both a practical tool for instructors and a means of facilitating measurement-driven QIS education research.
Create a lesson
Related papers
AI-Augmented Inquiry and Regulation in Hybrid Systems: A Control Allocation Architecture for Preserving Epistemic Agency in Hybrid Human-AI Cognition
Jochen Kuhn, Peter Gerjets, Ulrich Trautwein et al.
Using Gemini and LuaLaTeX to transcribe physics videos into PDF/UA-2 and ISO 32005 math-accessible PDFs
Craig W. Looney, Christopher L. Duston
Large Scale AI Grading of Handwritten Physics Assessments: Score Agreement and Olympiad Team Selection Outcomes
Praveen Pathak, Siddharth Tiwary, Charudatt Kadolkar et al.
Teaching Quantum Design Automation with Block-Based Programming
Damian Rovara, Robert Wille
PhysTrackX: Open-Source Software for Kinematics Tracking for the Physics Laboratory
Isam Abdullah Balghari, Muhammad Sabieh Anwar
Development of the RIOT 2 for use in LA-supported classrooms
Gina M. Quan, Cassandra Paul, Nithin Keshavamurthy et al.