The Price of Submission
Johan Fourie
Abstract
Economics journals ration access to peer review with time and money. A July 2026 census of 500 RePEc-ranked economics journals accepting unsolicited submissions finds that 113 (22.6 per cent) charge a fee, with incidence falling from 68 per cent in the top 50 to 2 per cent in the bottom 50. A sequential-submission model shows that waiting pays part of the capacity-clearing price, leaving the fee as a residual. Because rejected manuscripts move down the ranking, a fee reduces system-wide referee demand only when authors stop, shorten their submission chains or switch to journals requiring fewer reports.
Create a lesson
Related papers
PPML and Heavy-Tailed Trade and Factor Flows: Why Standard Inference Fails and How to Fix It
Peter H. Egger, Ting Ji, Yulong Wang
Multitask Reinforcement Learning for Assisting Choice Model Specification
Gabriel Nova, Stephane Hess, Sander Van Cranenburgh
Why a Non-Discriminatory Royalty Surcharge Is Not Chip-Neutral: The Error in FTC v. Qualcomm
Sang-Seung Yi
Whom Do AI Agents Work For? Role Assignment Induces Sponsorship Bias in LLM Recommenders
Davood Wadi, Yu Ma
An Integrative Multidimensional Conceptualization of Telework Behavior: A Systematic Review and Grounded Theory Approach
Sahar Babaei, Saeed Nosratabadi, Thabit Atobishi et al.
Global Poverty Beyond the Official Line: A bounded estimate of material insufficiency
Giancarlo Crocetti