Numerical and perceptual validity of synthetic Head-Related Transfer Functions at scale

Abstract

Individually measuring head-related transfer functions (HRTFs) at scale remains a central challenge for personalised spatial audio, motivating growing interest in synthetic HRTFs. We evaluated the numerical, computational, and behavioural validity of synthetic HRTFs, generated through the boundary element method simulation using Mesh2HRTF, against measured and KEMAR HRTFs using the Extended SONICOM dataset. Across 200 subjects, synthetic HRTFs deviated less from measured than KEMAR in interaural time and level differences, but residual errors, together with elevated spectral distortion, concentrated at low, rear elevations. This is consistent with the omission of torso geometry from the synthesis pipeline. Two computational models revealed a corresponding pattern of predicted localisation errors, with synthetic HRTFs positioned between measured and KEMAR. In a virtual reality localisation task (N = 20), synthetic HRTFs matched measured on every polar metric, while KEMAR was significantly worse. However, behavioural error clustered around the front-back midline regardless of condition, not at the low elevations implicated numerically or by the models. A separate spatial release from masking task (N = 18) showed no effect of HRTF type. Together, these results indicate that high-resolution synthetic HRTFs preserve behavioural localisation performance, despite discrepancies between the numerical/model-predicted bias and the spatial pattern of behavioural error.