VLCP: Vision Language Control Policy Closed-Loop Code Replanning for Robot Manipulation
Dhia Naouali, Minghan Wu, Claudia Wong, Abhinav Puthran, Omar G. Younis
Abstract
Turning a frontier vision-language model into a robot policy usually means fine-tuning it to emit an action representation it never saw in pretraining, which throws away much of the reasoning that made the model worth reaching for. We go the other way and keep the VLM frozen. It writes the policy as a short Python control function, with no demonstrations and no fine-tuning. Writing that code once is open-loop, though. Existing closed-loop methods react at the wrong level: they retry a fixed policy or pick a different subtask, but never rewrite the code that failed. VLCP closes the loop where the failure actually lives, on the control code, within a single episode. Every K steps the VLM re-observes the scene from multi-view RGB, proprioceptive state, and a state delta, then rewrites the control function from what it just saw, so a failure is caught before it compounds. We evaluate on a 57-task MuJoCo/RoboVerse sweep. This training-free policy reaches 35.1\% pooled success, against 3.5\% for the identical system queried once per episode. That tenfold gap holds with non-overlapping confidence intervals in every scene family. The gain traces to a 27.3\% within-episode recovery rate on failed grasps: a miss an open-loop controller would carry to the end of the episode gets re-observed and fixed at the next replan. And the loop stays cheap. A median 84\% of input tokens hit cache, an episode needs only about 10 compact queries, and control blocks written during any replan persist to a cross-episode skill library reused in later prompts.
Create a lesson
Related papers
rMuscle: Robotic Muscle Memory for Efficient Vision-Language-Action Model Inference
Kaijun Zhou, Zhiyang Li, Le Chen et al.
ElastiQP: An Always-Feasible QP Solver for Constrained Robot Control
Daniel Morton, Jon Arrizabalaga, Zachary Manchester et al.
"What's going to happen after I'm gone?": Parent Perspectives on Technology in Supporting Independent Living for Adults with Intellectual Disabilities
Alexander Tyshka, Andrea Macklem-Zabel, Absalat Getachew et al.
Learning Holistic Whole-Body Loco-Manipulation with a Bipedal Mobile Manipulator
Zhongyu Chen, Yuxuan Nai, Qian Chen et al.
CaSCo: Cascade-Aware Soft-Collision Motion Planning
Shivaram Kumar, Gaoyuan Liu, Yoonchang Sung
Examining the Difference in Human Behavior Between Virtual and Real-World Human-Robot Teaming
Sean Dallas, Absalat Getachew, Motaz AbuHijleh et al.