Position: Behavioral Systems Require Behavioral Tests
Manuel Cherep, Nikhil Singh, Pattie Maes
Abstract
Artificial agentic systems increasingly operate as behavioral systems by interacting with dynamic environments, pursuing goals, and adapting over time. Yet, current evaluation methods largely focus on performance outcomes, not the underlying behavioral processes that produce them. This paper argues that AI agents must be evaluated like other behavioral systems: through systematic observation, perturbation, and interpretation of their actions. We draw on lessons from the behavioral sciences to motivate this position, and propose a research agenda focused on developing rigorous behavioral tests. These include methods for recovering decision strategies from action sequences, constructing environments that isolate behavioral differences, and probing emergent dynamics in multi-agent systems. Taken together, these directions offer a roadmap for developing a science of AI behavior.
Create a lesson
Related papers
WikiSkill: Compiling Agent Experience into Persistent Knowledge for Skill Evolution
Liyan Tang, Cyrus Rashtchian, Chun-Sung Ferng et al.
Mechanistic Reaction Prediction via Discrete Flow Matching on Graph-Structured Electron Occupation
Nguyen Xuan-Vu, Octavian Susanu, Daniel Armstrong et al.
Learning a Continuous Sepsis Severity Score Without Hour-by-Hour Supervision: A Two-Site Retrospective Study
Kevin Zhu, Ryan Zhang, Baraa Abed et al.
CorporateBench: Large-Scale Q&A Benchmarking with Temporal Knowledge Bases
Sil Hamilton, Albert Yu Sun, Oscar J. Romero et al.
Sophistication in GenAI Use: Field Evidence from a Large Firm
Nicholas J. Hallman, Zachary T. Kowaleski, Anu Puvvada et al.
Not All Eval-Awareness Is Equal: Capabilities Framing Predicts Compliance
Allison Zhuang, Santiago Aranguri