Evaluating Spacing Tests of Multi-Modality
Greg Kreider
Abstract
The spacing of data contains information about the underlying modality. Sections of consistent, similar spacing correspond to modes while it increases between them. We have defined parametric, runs-based non-parametric, and data driven tests to evaluate these features --- flats and peaks --- and determine the presence and location of multiple modes. This report will check the tests in two situations. By varying a bi-modal setup we can control the changes in spacing and determine the resolution and sensitivity of the tests. By applying them to the large number of test cases that exist in the literature from other modality studies we check the stability and consistency of the results. We will also evaluate the accuracy of the null-distribution models of the features. The results show that the spacing does reflect the data's modality, that the tests do screen marginal cases, and where the analysis begins to break down.
Create a lesson
Related papers
RECaST-Surv: A Calibrated Borrowing Method for Survival Endpoints in Unequal Randomized Trials
Dehua Bi, Arlina Shen, Ruben P. A. van Eijk et al.
Beyond Pretrends: A Discordance-Based Sensitivity Analysis for Difference-in-Differences
Thomas Leavitt
Earth and space observations meet complex algebras: from complex to octonions for multivariate autoregressive time series analysis
Susana Eyheramendy, Felipe Elorrieta, Wilfredo Palma et al.
Efficient transport and generalization of survival treatment effects
Axel Martin, Iván Díaz, Michele Santacatterina
A new tractable Archimedean copula for full-range tail dependence
Lei Hua
Doubly valid and doubly sharp sensitivity analysis to unobserved confounding for survival outcomes
Jean-Baptiste Baitairian, Bernard Sebastien, Rana Jreich et al.