Influence of the inter-orbital interaction and kinetic terms on superconductivity: a simple two-orbital Hubbard model
Vito Marino, Diego Florez-Ablan, Luca F. Tocchio, Massimo Capone, Federico Becca
Abstract
We investigate a minimal two-orbital Hubbard model with intra- and inter-orbital nearest-neighbor hopping t and t, as well as intra- and inter-orbital density-density interactions U and U' by means of variational ansätze based on Jastrow-Slater wave functions within quantum Monte Carlo techniques. To focus on the electronic mechanisms of superconductivity, we restrict the variational ansätze to uniform nonmagnetic states with an explicit pairing amplitude and compute the pairing correlations as a function of filling and model parameters. At U/t=10, superconducting correlations are highly enhanced by the presence of inter-orbital terms, U' and t. For t=0, a finite value of U' effectively screens the intra-orbital repulsion U, producing a shift in the superconducting dome. Consequently, inter-orbital repulsion yields a sizable increase in electron pairing compared to the single-orbital baseline. Furthermore, introducing a finite t provides an additional boost to superconducting correlations, an effect driven by the simultaneous presence of flat and broad bands in the electronic structure.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Exact and fast series expansions for quantum models with long-range interactions
Antonia Duft, Patrick Adelhardt, Jan Alexander Koziol et al.
Electronic correlations shape the low-energy optical response of the kagome antiferromagnets Mn3Sn and Mn3Ge
R. Mathew Roy, Bo Tai, Maxim Wenzel et al.
Orbital-Induced Peierls Transitions: How Orbitals Orchestrate Lattice Instability
T. Mizokawa, S. V. Streltsov
Optical investigation of the electronic structure of a ferromagnetic Weyl semimetal CeAlSi
Shin-ichi Kimura, Yue Pan, Hiroshi Watanabe et al.
Assessing the Reliability of Anomalous Hall Conductivity Extraction in GdAlSi
Anil Kumar, Debapratim Pal, Sudhan Koirala et al.
What does "instant thermalization" in large-q SYK models mean?
Alexander Osterkorn, Jan C. Louw