Latent Action as Intention Enables Efficient Future Imagination for World Action Models
Xiang Li, Yupeng Zheng, Songen Gu, Huailiang Ma, Feng Yu, Yuhang Zheng, Xian Nie, Shanshuai Yuan, Yujie Zang, Weize Li, Shuai Tian, Moyang Liu, Ya-Qin Zhang, Wenchao Ding
Abstract
World action models (WAMs) improve robot control by modeling how observations evolve, but generating future observations at test time incurs substantial latency. Fast-WAM removes this process for efficiency; however, our matched implementations show lower generalization for Fast-WAM than for future-aware alternatives, especially with scarce robot demonstrations and in out-of-distribution scenarios. To bridge this gap, we introduce **LAWA**, a WAM architecture that uses compact latent actions as an operational representation of future intentions, enabling efficient test-time future imagination without generating future observations. Specifically, a discrete tokenizer enhanced by action-free pre-training produces manipulation-centric codebook targets. LAWA jointly denoises a continuous latent state anchored to these targets with executable action chunks while omitting the future-video branch at inference. On RoboCasa, LAWA achieves state-of-the-art average success rates of 65.6% and 80.8% in the few-shot and full data settings, improving over the matched Fast-WAM baseline by 9.6 and 4.5 points, respectively. It also preserves the performance level of the matched Joint-WAM variant while requiring 42.9% lower inference latency. LAWA also demonstrates competitive zero-shot robustness on LIBERO-Plus and superior performance on real-world tasks. These results show that future imagination need not be discarded: retaining it with compact latent actions yields an effective trade-off among performance, generalization, and latency. Code and models will be released.
Create a lesson
Related papers
rMuscle: Robotic Muscle Memory for Efficient Vision-Language-Action Model Inference
Kaijun Zhou, Zhiyang Li, Le Chen et al.
ElastiQP: An Always-Feasible QP Solver for Constrained Robot Control
Daniel Morton, Jon Arrizabalaga, Zachary Manchester et al.
"What's going to happen after I'm gone?": Parent Perspectives on Technology in Supporting Independent Living for Adults with Intellectual Disabilities
Alexander Tyshka, Andrea Macklem-Zabel, Absalat Getachew et al.
Learning Holistic Whole-Body Loco-Manipulation with a Bipedal Mobile Manipulator
Zhongyu Chen, Yuxuan Nai, Qian Chen et al.
CaSCo: Cascade-Aware Soft-Collision Motion Planning
Shivaram Kumar, Gaoyuan Liu, Yoonchang Sung
Examining the Difference in Human Behavior Between Virtual and Real-World Human-Robot Teaming
Sean Dallas, Absalat Getachew, Motaz AbuHijleh et al.