GenAIT: Development and Validation of an Objective Generative AI Literacy Test for High School Students
Brett Puppart, Kristjan-Julius Laak, Jaan Aru
Abstract
There is growing international interest in generative AI (GenAI) literacy and its assessment among high school students, but objective assessment in this population remains underdeveloped. This article reports the iterative development and validation of the GenAI Literacy Test (GenAIT), an 18-item multiple-choice test measuring high school students' conceptual knowledge about GenAI, with content spanning technical, practical, and human-impact domains. Expert review of relevance, clarity, and comprehensiveness provided evidence of content validity. In a large-scale survey of 7432 Estonian high school students, we evaluated the psychometric functioning of the Estonian-language GenAIT using confirmatory factor analysis, classical test theory, and item response theory. Results supported approximate unidimensionality, broadly adequate reliability for group-level research (marginal reliability = .72, KR-20 = .69), and good fit of a three-parameter logistic model (RMSEA = .013, TLI = .987, CFI = .990, SRMSR = .021). Measurement precision was sufficient for the majority of students but varied substantially across the latent trait, with lower precision for lower scoring students. GenAIT is therefore more suitable for group-level research than high-stakes individual classification. GenAIT scores were unrelated to perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use, and negatively associated with LLM use frequency, suggesting that frequent use and favorable perceptions of AI should not be treated as proxies for conceptual understanding.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Prepared Or Unprepared? Evaluating Healthcare Workforce Readiness for Clinical Adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Nigeria
Abbas M. Rabiu, Abdulrazaq A. Zubair, Um-mulkhairi Ibrahim et al.
Could Underwater Data Centers Pose a Risk to AI Treaty Verification?
James Teague, Ashmita Rajmohan, Yannick Muehlhaeuser
Control-Theoretic Content Moderation
Benedetta Tessa, Serena Tardelli, Marco Avvenuti et al.
"If I Had to Buy Just ONE: Galaxy S26 Ultra": Auditing AI-Generated Product Recommendations
Lucas G. Uberti-Bona Marin, Thales Bertaglia, Giovanni Astante et al.
Understanding AI Provider Recommendations in Local Service Markets
Hazem Ibrahim, Yasir Zaki
Toward a Time-Aware Assessment Framework for the Carbon Cost of AI-Enabled Decarbonization
Chenrui Xu, Burcu Akinci, Christopher McComb