The Value of Human Expertise
Bradley Sturt
Abstract
We consider optimization applications with unknown parameters where the decision maker believes that the optimal value of the nominal problem-the optimization problem they would have solved if the true parameters were known-is unlikely to be large. This belief derives from information that humans have that is not captured in datasets, obtained from domain knowledge and interacting with the physical world. We propose an approach to evaluating policies that provides tighter performance guarantees if the decision maker's belief happens to be correct. Our main result shows that if computing a policy's worst-case performance is a convex program, then the value of human expertise-the maximum improvement in performance guarantees that can be obtained from the belief about the nominal problem-is equal to the minimax gap of a max-min problem. We illustrate our developments in assortment optimization and shortest path problems.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Level-Set Geometry and the Theoretical Performance of PDHG for Conic Linear Optimization
Zikai Xiong, Robert M. Freund
Trajectory Manifolds for Nonlinear Data-Enabled Predictive Control
Arda Bayer
Optimizing Lyapunov Certificates via Stability-Preserving Quadratization for Polynomial Systems
Yubo Cai, Gioele Zardini
Regularity of a Multidimensional Principal-Agent Problem with Separable Effort Costs
Shuaijie Qian, Guan Qiao
Near-Optimal Exact-Value Zeroth-Order Complexity for Smooth Strongly Convex Optimization
Wendao Wu, Haihan Zhang, Chenheng Zhang et al.
A VU-calculus for composite functions and the U-Hessian of partly smooth functions
Shuai Liu