The Role of Geometric Analysis in Interferometer Design and Optimization for Gravitational Quantum Entanglement
Alireza Maleki
Abstract
The pursuit of a quantum theory of gravity, aiming to unify general relativity and quantum mechanics, remains one of the most enduring challenges in physics. Because of the extreme energy scales associated with the Planck regime, direct experimental evidence for quantum gravity remains elusive. However, recent proposals suggest that quantum entanglement between two massive particles may provide a pathway to probe the quantum nature of gravity. In this study, we examine the interferometer geometries proposed in these works, with particular attention to the commonly used approximation that neglects phase contributions from the vertical segments of the particle trajectories. Our analysis shows that this approximation can lead to incorrect predictions and, in certain parameter regimes, to null results where entanglement would otherwise be expected. We derive exact solutions that incorporate the full particle trajectories and demonstrate that the vertical arms can significantly affect the accumulated phase. Crucially, we identify configurations in which the induced entanglement vanishes entirely, a feature missed by simplified treatments. These findings show that accounting for the full interferometer geometry is not merely a refinement, but is essential for accurately assessing gravity-induced entanglement.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Continuous variable distributed quantum sensing in integrated photonics
Bethany Puzio, Oliver M. Green, Joel F. Tasker et al.
Securing quantum error correction against misleading advice from AI agents
A. Barış Özgüler
Exact logical error rates for magic state cultivation
Kwok Ho Wan, Ainhoa Zapirain
Hamiltonian engineering via pulses: beyond group averaging
Ivan Beschastnyi, Lucah Patel, David Tinoco
Logarithmic-depth quantum simulation of boson sampling
Changhun Oh
Entanglement swapping across a five-node relay in a multiplexed quantum-classical network
Andrew R. Cameron, Jordan M. Thomas, Alexandru Macridin et al.