Peer Review at Capacity: An editor's view
Yamir Moreno
Abstract
From the editor's desk, the pressure on peer review is no longer an abstract concern. It appears in the growing number of invitations needed to secure an appropriate report, the repeated reliance on a small group of dependable colleagues, and the duplication of work when manuscripts move between journals. The problem is not simply that science has too few potential reviewers. It is that reviewing labor is unevenly distributed, weakly recognized, and organized through a publication architecture built for a smaller system.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Does the Power-Law Advantage in the Tails Outweigh the Global q-Gaussian Description?
Eduardo Boor, Roberto da Silva, Joao Carlos Schmitt de Siqueira et al.
The Mechanics of Democratic Dominance: A System Dynamics Paradigm for Dynamic Consent Engineering
Muhammad Sukri Bin Ramli
Open, Reproducible Per-Bidding-Zone Carbon Intensity for Nordic Power Systems
Eirik Botten Nicolaysen
ButterMamba: Butterworth-Enhanced Spatial-Temporal Mamba for Efficient Traffic Flow Prediction
Limiao Zhang, Yuhui Lu, Jie Gao et al.
Integrating adaptive human behavior into epidemic models with large language models
Yicheng Mao, Haoyang Li, Rob Deardon et al.
Measurement Validity in LLM Cultural Alignment
An Duy Nguyen, Muhammad Aurangzeb Ahmad