Comment on "Event-Triggered Stabilization of Linear Time-Delay Systems via Halanay-Type Inequality"
Luke Jonker, Kexue Zhang
Abstract
This comment revisits Lemma 1 in [1], which plays a central role in the event-triggered stabilization analysis developed therein. We identify technical gaps in the proof of the lemma and provide a corrected argument. In particular, careful treatment of the exponentially decaying term shows that its decay rate must be retained in the resulting convergence estimate. The statement of the original lemma, with the exponential decay rate determined by the minimum of the characteristic decay rate and the decay rate of this term, remains valid.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Level-Set Geometry and the Theoretical Performance of PDHG for Conic Linear Optimization
Zikai Xiong, Robert M. Freund
Trajectory Manifolds for Nonlinear Data-Enabled Predictive Control
Arda Bayer
Optimizing Lyapunov Certificates via Stability-Preserving Quadratization for Polynomial Systems
Yubo Cai, Gioele Zardini
Regularity of a Multidimensional Principal-Agent Problem with Separable Effort Costs
Shuaijie Qian, Guan Qiao
Near-Optimal Exact-Value Zeroth-Order Complexity for Smooth Strongly Convex Optimization
Wendao Wu, Haihan Zhang, Chenheng Zhang et al.
A VU-calculus for composite functions and the U-Hessian of partly smooth functions
Shuai Liu