The zbMATH Open Knowledge Graph: Tracing Centuries of Mathematical Research
Yuni Susanti, Moritz Schubotz
Abstract
We present the zbMATH Open Knowledge Graph, a large-scale RDF knowledge graph (KG) covering more than 250 years of mathematical scholarship. Unlike existing scholarly knowledge graphs that primarily capture bibliographic metadata and citation structures, the zbMATH Open KG integrates expert-curated semantic content, including reviews, keywords, subject classifications, software references, and disambiguated authorship. This combination of domain-specific representation of mathematical knowledge and extensive temporal coverage supports analyses that require fine-grained exploration of mathematical concepts, research fields, and scholarly relationships over time. The resulting graph comprises 34 million entities and 168 million RDF triples represented using established Semantic Web vocabularies, supporting interoperability and FAIR data principles. We further demonstrate its capabilities through query-driven historically grounded scholarly exploration use cases, illustrating how the knowledge graph can surface relationships and patterns that may be difficult to identify from bibliographic and citation information alone. The zbMATH Open KG provides an open semantic infrastructure for studying the development of mathematical knowledge and tracing scholarly connections across centuries of scholarship.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Guiding LLM Peer Reviewers: The Impact of Score Anchors on Review Evidence and Accuracy
Judita Preiss, Yunhan Yang
Beyond Human-Likeness: Mapping the Scientific Critique Profiles of LLMs and Human Reviewers
Yunhan Yang, Mike Thelwall, Guoxiu He
Citing Less Critically: LLMs Reshape the Rhetoric and Reach of Scientific Citation
Yixuan Liu, Lin Chen, Zhuoqi Liu et al.
Do Large Language Models Favour Any Research Topics?
Mike Thelwall
Tracing high-profile attention to questionable research as a case for funder due diligence
Federica Silvi, Leslie D. McIntosh
SoniMet - A tool for sonifying and visualizing the performance of single researchers
Tim Waterfield, Lutz Bornmann