Parliamentary mention networks reflect the organisation and dynamics of Finnish political discourse
Henna Poikkimäki, Petri Leskinen, Petter Holme
Abstract
The primary purpose of the parliamentary discussion is to present and debate legislative drafts. Mentions of other Members of the Parliament (MPs) and interruptions of them represent the structure of the political discourse. Name mentions can be automatically recognised in speech transcripts and linked to the relevant MPs. We construct networks of MPs based on name mentions in 96753 speeches delivered during the electoral terms 2015-2018 and 2019-2022 in the Finnish Parliament to study the structures of interaction within parliamentary discussion. The results show that the networks are not polarized, although there is slight bias towards mentioning one's own party members. Activity on the parliamentary floor, political seniority and minister status have a positive correlation with higher centrality scores of MPs. Our analysis is generalizable to different political arenas and is an interesting basis for comparison across regional assemblies or countries.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Behavioral calibration of mobile-phone GPS data for population-representative analyses
Nicolò Alessandro Girardini, Unchitta Kan, Eduardo López et al.
Simultaneous Holotheticity and Bi-Hamiltonian Structures in Economic Growth Theory
Sarah Finkle, Roman G. Smirnov
How Fast Do Agents Rot? An Empirical Study of Long-Horizon Degradation in LLM Agents for Production Decision-Making
Shubhra Mittal
Modeling of Mobility and Energy Policies in an Agent-Based Framework: Case Studies for Chicago Region in 2050
Md Rakibul Alam, Omer Verbas, Taner Cokyasar et al.
Modeling microbiome dynamics on social networks: how between-host transmission shapes within-host evolution
Longmei Shu, Feng Fu
Rock, Paper, Scissors, ... Dynamite - A Model of Disruption from New Technologies
Andrew J. Lohn