A Tale of Two Calibrators: Comparing Newtonian and Photon Calibration in Advanced LIGO after the Third Observing Run
Dana Jones, Michael P. Ross, Ling Sun, Jeffrey S. Kissel, Dripta Bhattacharjee, Anthony Sanchez, Bram J. J. Slagmolen, Jens Gundlach
Abstract
Precise calibration of LIGO's strain readout plays a vital role in our ability to extract information from gravitational-wave detections. We present a comparative analysis of two independent direct-force calibration methods: the Newtonian Calibrator (NCal) and Photon Calibrator (PCal) systems. Currently, LIGO relies solely on the PCal system as its absolute calibration reference. To facilitate comparison, a series of direct-force injections were performed using the NCal and PCal systems at the LIGO Hanford observatory just after the completion of the third observing run. We compute the ratio of the measured to expected strain amplitudes for every injection. For each injection frequency across a 30 Hz band, the ratios of NCal and PCal differ by 1%, demonstrating a small systematic discrepancy between the two systems. This difference highlights the importance of maintaining multiple independent calibration references to validate LIGO's calibration.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Charged black-hole binary radiation at second post-Newtonian order
Andrea Placidi, Elisa Grilli, Matteo Pegorin et al.
Ultralight Bosons Explain the Mass-Spin Correlations in the Merging Binary Black Hole Population
Xiao-Xiao Kou, Vuk Mandic, Ran Ding et al.
Thermal Quantum Fluctuations in Einstein-Nonlinear Maxwell-Yukawa Black Hole
M. Mangut
Relativistic stellar collapse of initially static configurations
Keshlan S. Govinder, Megandhren Govender, Sunil Maharaj
Frequency-domain extended-effective-source gravitational self-force for eccentric Schwarzschild orbits
Xuchen Lu, Yungui Gong, Bokai Zhang et al.
Covariant linear response theory for a photon gas in curved spacetime
Jianan Wang, Long Cui, Bin Wu